“...we can now react at the speed of business...” “...our confidence in the reliability and repeatability of the deployment process has been restored...” “...manual, error-prone deployments are a thing of the past...” “...the best thing since sliced bread when it comes to managing projects and their environments...” “...BuildMaster makes sense of incremental builds and their very liquid feature sets...” “BuildMaster made us re-think what proper deployment is...” “...it's 2:45 AM your time?! Do you guys never sleep?” “...we implemented a *real* deployment process...” “...extremely capable software, especially in an enterprise environment...” “...this is a very solid piece of software!” “BuildMaster is a great tool for automating the build process, but stands head and shoulders above other tools...” “BuildMaster is absolutely swell!” “...all of my projects are building wonderfully and are fully integrated into deployment...”

View Question

« Back to Posts

BuildMaster and Hudson Co-exist?

We do currently use Hudson for our continuous integration server. Can buildmaster connect or co-exist with that or would we need to replace it with buildmaster ?
Yes, Hudson (or another CI server) can definitely co-exist. Some of our customers simply have BuildMaster pickup artifacts or build output from another tool like Hudson and use BuildMaster to deployment and implement the approval processes.

However, BuildMaster does have CI capabilites (see Build Schedules), and can completely replace your Hudson/CI tool in the future
Reply To Post »